There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

2012 Player Register

(sorted by August 2012 rating)

1

GM Robert Hess — 2719

7

GM Sam Shankland — 2676

10

GM Joel Benjamin — 2646

12

GM Julio Becerra — 2616

14

GM Julio Sadorra — 2598

16

GM Boris Gulko — 2590

21

GM Conrad Holt — 2569

22

GM Jesse Kraai — 2567

25

GM Vinay Bhat — 2555

26

IM David Vigorito — 2548

28

GM Andre Diamant — 2527

29

IM Steven Zierk — 2527

30

IM Georgi Orlov — 2523

32

IM Eli Vovsha — 2514

35

IM Puchen Wang — 2509

37

FM Costin Cozianu — 2508

38

SM Robert Perez — 2504

39

SM Denys Shmelov — 2502

40

IM Levon Altounian — 2493

41

FM Tom Bartell — 2489

42

IM Farai Mandizha — 2484

43

IM Justin Sarkar — 2483

44

IM Lev Milman — 2479

47

IM Zhanibek Amanov — 2463

49

SM William Fisher — 2445

50

GM Larry Kaufman — 2445

51

IM Nazi Paikidze — 2444

52

FM Charles Riordan — 2438

53

IM Keaton Kiewra — 2436

57

SM Peter Minear — 2427

58

SM Matt Herman — 2425

59

FM Kazim Gulamali — 2419

60

IM Levan Bregadze — 2416

61

IM Jay Bonin — 2416

62

FM Slava Mikhailuk — 2415

63

FM Robby Adamson — 2415

65

FM Jeffery Xiong — 2412

66

FM Michael Bodek — 2409

67

IM John Donaldson — 2408

68

FM Alec Getz — 2407

69

IM Mark Ginsburg — 2400

71

SM Arslan Otchiyev — 2399

72

FM Samuel Sevian — 2396

73

FM Yian Liou — 2390

75

FM Eric Rodriguez — 2383

76

NM Joshua Colas — 2376

77

FM Oleg Zaikov — 2374

80

IM Albert Kapengut — 2367

81

WGM Anna Sharevich — 2366

82

NM Kevin Wang — 2366

83

FM Marcel Milat — 2358

84

FM Arthur Shen — 2358

85

NM Jared Defibaugh — 2357

86

FM Kassa Korley — 2353

87

NM Jeffrey Haskel — 2347

91

NM Ian Harris — 2342

92

FM Eugene Yanayt — 2339

93

NM Artur Safin — 2333

94

NM Justus Williams — 2331

95

FM Dov Gorman — 2327

96

NM Daniel Lowinger — 2318

97

NM Chris Mabe — 2314

98

FM Michael Casella — 2308

101

FM Fabio La Rota — 2305

102

NM Christopher Wu — 2304

103

FM Ralph Zimmer — 2304

104

NM Alex King — 2303

105

NM Andrew Wang — 2302

106

FM Andy Lee — 2300

107

FM Carsten Hansen — 2299

108

FM Karl Dehmelt — 2298

109

FM Harutyun Akopyan — 2295

110

FM Curt Collyer — 2294

111

WIM Carla Heredia — 2292

112

FM Ron Simpson — 2288

113

IM Richard Costigan — 2288

114

FM Pedram Atoufi — 2275

115

WIM Yuanling Yuan — 2270

116

NM Joshua Sinanan — 2263

117

NM Ilya Krasik — 2261

118

NM Ernesto Alvarez — 2257

119

NM Alexander Katz — 2250

120

NM Craig Jones — 2249

121

NM Kapil Chandran — 2246

122

NM Joshua Mu — 2242

123

NM Richard Selzler — 2242

124

NM Troy Daly — 2238

125

NM Jonathan Chiang — 2234

126

NM Ben Goldberg — 2233

127

FM Doug Eckert — 2229

128

NM Carlito Agner — 2228

129

FM Michael Shahade — 2210

130

NM Roland Feng — 2204

132

NM Andrew Ryba — 2202

133

NM Cameron Wheeler — 2200

135

NM Kesav Viswanadha — 2181

136

NM Daniel Gater — 2178

137

NM Peter Lessler — 2177

138

Isaac Martinez — 2174

139

Michael Omori — 2171

141

John Timmel — 2155

142

NM Jake Miller — 2155

143

Bennet Pellows — 2152

144

Andrew Liu — 2148

145

Miguel Recio — 2147

146

Nicholas Rosenthal — 2146

147

WFM Amanda Mateer — 2144

148

Isaac Barayev — 2144

149

Nick Karlow — 2127

151

Vince Klemm — 2073

152

Shaun Smith — 2066

153

Sam Silberman — 2056

154

Nicolas Checa — 2052

155

John Michael Burke — 2035

156

Tony Rich — 2012

157

Nicky Korba — 2007

158

Zachary Tanenbaum — 2002

159

Travis Guenther — 1969

160

Matthew Larson — 1918

Players who have played games in 2012 and are no longer on a roster

1

GM Ben Finegold — 2568

2

NM Sarah Chiang — 2257

4

NM Carey Theil — 2183

6

Joel Hanks — 1982

7

John Salisbury — 1970

Player Lists by Year

2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005