There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Philadelphia Inventors /

IM Richard Costigan


Richard Costigan's Games

2015 Games: (0.0/1)

  1. Week 9: FM Aravind Kumar (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0

2015 MVP Points: (-2.5)
2015 Performance Rating: 1886



2014 Games: (3.5/5)

  1. Week 5: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs WGM Katerina Nemcova (RIO) 1-0
  2. Week 6: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs Aaron Jacobson (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 7: NM Damir Studen (ATL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs SM Ryan Goldenberg (MAN) 1-0
  5. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Ilker Bozkurt (CAR) 1/2-1/2

2014 MVP Points: 7
2014 Performance Rating: 2488



2013 Games: (1.5/3)

  1. Week 2: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Alexander Katz (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 4: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Roland Feng (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 7: NM Atulya Vaidya (DAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2

2013 MVP Points: 1
2013 Performance Rating: 2279



2012 Games: (3.0/7)

  1. Week 1: FM Ralph Zimmer (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 6: NM Cameron Wheeler (SF) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 7: Shaun Smith (MAN) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 9: Nicolas Checa (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Quarterfinals: FM Ralph Zimmer (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  6. Semifinals: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Alex King (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  7. Championship: NM Roland Feng (SEA) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: 0.5
2012 Performance Rating: 2148



2010 Games: (4.5/7)

  1. Week 1: Sean Finn (NJ) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  2. Week 3: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs Justus Williams (NY) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: NM Richard Selzler (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: FM Gauri Shankar (CHC) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Charles Riordan (NE) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Richard Selzler (BAL) 1-0
  7. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Andrei Zaremba (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2010 MVP Points: 7
2010 Performance Rating: 2379



2009 Games: (2.0/5)

  1. Week 6: FM Florin Felecan (CHC) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 7: NM Yaacov Norowitz (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Ralph Zimmer (BAL) 0-1
  4. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Victor Shen (NJ) 0-1
  5. Week 10: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Carlito Agner (CAR) 1-0

2009 MVP Points: (-0.5)
2009 Performance Rating: 2238



2008 Games: (2.0/7)

  1. Week 1: IM Alex Lenderman (MAN) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 4: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Sam Shankland (SF) 0-1
  3. Week 5: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs WFM Bayaraa Zorigt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Marc Esserman (BOS) 0-1

2008 MVP Points: (-6.5)
2008 Performance Rating: 2219



2007 Games: (3.5/9)

  1. Week 1: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Alejandro Moreno Roman (MIA) 1-0
  2. Week 4: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  3. Week 5: FM James Critelli (MAN) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  4. Week 6: IM Jacek Stopa (DAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 7: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Aviv Friedman (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Robert Hess (NY) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 10: NM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  9. Wildcard Round: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1

2007 MVP Points: (-1)
2007 Performance Rating: 2312



2006 Games: (6.0/10)

  1. Week 1: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Igor Foygel (BOS) 0-1
  3. Week 3: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Josh Friedel (SF) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Steven Winer (BOS) 1-0
  5. Week 5: FM Ray Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  7. Week 7: FM Ray Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  8. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs NM Craig Jones (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  9. Week 9: FM Andrei Zaremba (DAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  10. Week 10: IM Irina Krush (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2

2006 MVP Points: 10
2006 Performance Rating: 2479



2005 Games: (4.0/10)

  1. Week 1: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs GM Magesh Panchanathan (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Paul MacIntyre (BOS) 1-0
  3. Week 3: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) 0-1
  4. Week 4: NM Gregory Braylovsky (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 5: IM Blas Lugo (MIA) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: FM Matthew Hoekstra (CAR) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 0-1
  7. Week 7: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  8. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM John Donaldson (SF) 0-1
  9. Week 9: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Josh Friedel (BOS) 1-0
  10. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0

2005 MVP Points: (-3)
2005 Performance Rating: 2340



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2288
MVP Pts12
Lifetime Score30.0/64 (47%)
Performance Rating2321
Date of Birth1959