There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Connecticut Dreadnoughts /

IM Jay Bonin


Jay Bonin's Games

2013 Games: (4.0/8)

  1. Week 1: IM Jay Bonin (CON) vs NM Jared Defibaugh (BAL) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Jay Bonin (CON) vs SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: FM Dov Gorman (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (CON) 0-1
  4. Week 4: IM Jay Bonin (CON) vs IM Vitaly Neimer (STL) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: NM Mika Brattain (NE) vs IM Jay Bonin (CON) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: GM Robert Hungaski (MAN) vs IM Jay Bonin (CON) 1-0
  7. Week 8: IM Jay Bonin (CON) vs NM Vadim Martirosov (BOS) 0-1
  8. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (CON) vs NM Mika Brattain (NE) 1/2-1/2

2013 MVP Points: 1.5
2013 Performance Rating: 2400



2011 Games: (7.0/10) — Played for Philadelphia Inventors

  1. Week 1: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs IM John Bartholomew (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: IM Albert Kapengut (NJ) vs IM Jay Bonin (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Braden Bournival (NE) 1-0
  4. Week 5: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs WGM Sabina Foisor (BAL) 1-0
  5. Week 6: NM Kevin Cao (STL) vs IM Jay Bonin (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: NM Vadim Martirosov (BOS) vs IM Jay Bonin (PHI) 0-1
  7. Week 8: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Leif Pressman (NY) 1-0
  8. Week 9: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Andrei Zaremba (MAN) 1-0
  9. Week 10: SM Matt Herman (NY) vs IM Jay Bonin (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  10. Quarterfinals: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Farai Mandizha (MAN) 0-1

2011 MVP Points: 16.5
2011 Performance Rating: 2555



2010 Games: (3.5/5) — Played for Philadelphia Inventors

  1. Week 5: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Charles Riordan (NE) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 7: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs IM Robert Hungaski (NE) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Ralph Zimmer (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 9: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0
  5. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs FM Ron Simpson (CAR) 1-0

2010 MVP Points: 7
2010 Performance Rating: 2597



2009 Games: (0.5/1) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 2: FM Michael Lee (SEA) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1/2-1/2

2009 MVP Points: 1
2009 Performance Rating: 2384



2008 Games: (2.0/7) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 1: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Daniel Yeager (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: FM Ron Simpson (CAR) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  4. Week 5: IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  5. Week 6: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Marcel Milat (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: NM Marc Esserman (BOS) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  7. Week 8: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1/2-1/2

2008 MVP Points: (-6.5)
2008 Performance Rating: 2203



2007 Games: (5.5/8) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 1: WGM Katerina Rohonyan (BAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  2. Week 3: IM David Pruess (SF) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1
  3. Week 4: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM John Readey (SEA) 1-0
  5. Week 7: NM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  6. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  7. Wildcard Round: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1
  8. Semifinals: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1-0

2007 MVP Points: 3.5
2007 Performance Rating: 2506



2006 Games: (3.5/7) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 1: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Elvin Wilson (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  3. Week 4: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  4. Week 5: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Slava Mikhailuk (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Charles Riordan (BOS) 0-1
  7. Week 9: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Ray Kaufman (BAL) 1/2-1/2

2006 MVP Points: 1
2006 Performance Rating: 2350



2005 Games: (6.0/9) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 1: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs FM Paul MacIntyre (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  3. Week 4: NM Carl Boor (PHI) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1
  4. Week 5: GM Marcin Kaminski (CAR) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1-0
  5. Week 6: IM Peter Vavrak (DAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: FM William Kelleher (BOS) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1
  7. Week 8: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Andres Santalla (MIA) 1-0
  8. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  9. Semifinals: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1

2005 MVP Points: 8
2005 Performance Rating: 2498



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2423
MVP Pts32
Lifetime Score32.0/55 (58%)
Performance Rating2446
Date of Birth1955