There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Philadelphia Inventors /

IM Tom Bartell


Tom Bartell's Games

2015 Games: (4.0/8)

  1. Week 3: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  2. Week 4: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  3. Week 5: IM Daniel Gurevich (ATL) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: GM Alex Lenderman (MAN) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 7: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Sergey Kudrin (CON) 1-0
  6. Week 8: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  7. Week 9: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Mark Paragua (NY) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 10: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0

2015 MVP Points: 2
2015 Performance Rating: 2596



2014 Games: (4.0/7)

  1. Week 1: IM David Vigorito (NE) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  3. Week 3: GM Emil Anka (SEA) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  4. Week 4: IM Samuel Sevian (BOS) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Andrey Stukopin (RIO) 1-0
  6. Week 9: FM Andrey Chumachenko (CAR) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  7. Week 10: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 1/2-1/2

2014 MVP Points: 6.5
2014 Performance Rating: 2609



2013 Games: (4.0/9)

  1. Week 1: GM Zviad Izoria (MAN) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 3: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Mikheil Kekelidze (CON) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: GM Emil Anka (SEA) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  4. Week 5: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 6: IM Levan Bregadze (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0
  7. Week 8: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  8. Week 9: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Zviad Izoria (MAN) 0-1
  9. Week 10: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Tamaz Gelashvili (NY) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: (-2)
2013 Performance Rating: 2548



2012 Games: (3.5/6)

  1. Week 2: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Mark Ginsburg (ARZ) 0-1
  2. Week 7: IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  3. Week 8: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Mikheil Kekelidze (CON) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 10: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM David Vigorito (NE) 1-0
  5. Quarterfinals: GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  6. Semifinals: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: (-3.5)
2012 Performance Rating: 2575



2011 Games: (5.5/10)

  1. Week 2: FM Kassa Korley (CAR) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Boris Gulko (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: IM Robert Hungaski (NE) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  4. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 6: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs FM Joaquin Banawa (STL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Jan van de Mortel (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 8: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 9: IM John Bartholomew (MAN) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  9. Week 10: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Irina Krush (NY) 1/2-1/2
  10. Quarterfinals: IM John Bartholomew (MAN) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0

2011 MVP Points: 11
2011 Performance Rating: 2539



2010 Games: (4.5/8)

  1. Week 1: GM Boris Gulko (NJ) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  2. Week 2: SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  3. Week 3: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM John Fedorowicz (NY) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM David Vigorito (NE) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Angelo Young (CHC) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 8: GM Sergey Erenburg (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  8. Week 10: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2

2010 MVP Points: 7.5
2010 Performance Rating: 2555



2009 Games: (2.5/8)

  1. Week 2: FM Aviv Friedman (NJ) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  2. Week 3: FM Shinsaku Uesugi (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: SM Marc Esserman (BOS) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  4. Week 5: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs FM Andrei Zaremba (MAN) 0-1
  5. Week 7: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM John Fedorowicz (NY) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 9: GM Boris Gulko (NJ) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  8. Week 10: FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0

2009 MVP Points: (-5.5)
2009 Performance Rating: 2299



2008 Games: (4.5/6)

  1. Week 2: IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 0-1
  2. Week 6: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM David Vigorito (BOS) 1-0
  3. Week 7: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM John Bartholomew (DAL) 1-0
  4. Week 8: GM John Fedorowicz (NY) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 9: GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 10: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) 1-0

2008 MVP Points: 11
2008 Performance Rating: 2680



2007 Games: (0.0/1) — Played for New Jersey Knockouts

  1. Week 1: IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) vs FM Tom Bartell (NJ) 1-0

2007 MVP Points: (-3)
2007 Performance Rating: 2095



portrait

Stats as of August 2014

Rating2483
MVP Pts24
Lifetime Score32.5/63 (52%)
Performance Rating2537
Date of Birth1983