There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Miami Sharks /

FM Eric Rodriguez


Eric Rodriguez's Games

2014 Games: (0.5/1)

  1. Week 1: FM Leif Pressman (CON) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2

2014 MVP Points: 1
2014 Performance Rating: 2432



2013 Games: (6.5/9)

  1. Week 2: IM Vitaly Neimer (STL) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  2. Week 4: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1-0
  3. Week 5: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Ruifeng Li (DAL) 0-1
  4. Week 6: IM David Pruess (SF) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  5. Week 7: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Irina Krush (NY) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  6. Week 10: FM Alec Getz (DAL) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  7. Quarterfinals: NM Ruifeng Li (DAL) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  8. Semifinals: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Yian Liou (SF) 1/2-1/2
  9. Championship: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Akshat Chandra (NY) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: 15.5
2013 Performance Rating: 2611



2012 Games: (3.0/9)

  1. Week 1: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Doug Eckert (STL) 1-0
  2. Week 2: NM Michael Vilenchuk (BOS) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  3. Week 3: FM Alec Getz (DAL) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  5. Week 5: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Ron Simpson (CAR) 1-0
  6. Week 6: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Justin Sarkar (CON) 1/2-1/2 (Game of the Week!)     article
  7. Week 7: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Curt Collyer (SEA) 0-1
  8. Week 8: FM Robby Adamson (ARZ) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  9. Week 9: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Konstantin Kavutskiy (LA) 0-1

2012 MVP Points: (-8)
2012 Performance Rating: 2250



2011 Games: (3.5/10)

  1. Week 1: IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  2. Week 2: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs GM Josh Friedel (CHC) 0-1
  3. Week 3: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Slava Mikhailuk (SEA) 1-0
  4. Week 4: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  5. Week 5: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) 0-1
  6. Week 6: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Charles Riordan (NE) 1-0
  7. Week 7: WGM Tatev Abrahamyan (LA) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Week 8: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs Nick Karlow (STL) 1-0
  9. Week 9: IM Angelo Young (CHC) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  10. Week 10: FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs GM Julio Sadorra (DAL) 0-1

2011 MVP Points: (-9)
2011 Performance Rating: 2326



2010 Games: (0.0/3)

  1. Week 1: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Daniel Rensch (ARZ) 0-1
  2. Week 2: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) 0-1
  3. Week 4: IM Michael Brooks (STL) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0

2010 MVP Points: (-7.5)
2010 Performance Rating: 2045



2009 Games: (8.5/12)

  1. Week 1: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Keaton Kiewra (DAL) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Angelo Young (CHC) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  3. Week 4: David Justice (TEN) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 5: NM Chris Mabe (CAR) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  5. Week 6: FM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: FM Marcel Milat (SEA) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  7. Week 8: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs Adarsh Jayakumar (DAL) 1-0
  8. Week 9: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Ilya Krasik (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  9. Week 10: Amanda Mateer (ARZ) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  10. Quarterfinals: NM Howard Chen (SEA) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  11. Semifinals: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Yian Liou (SF) 1-0
  12. Championship: NM Yaacov Norowitz (NY) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  13. Championship Tiebreaker Game #1: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Yaacov Norowitz (NY) 0-1

2009 MVP Points: 13.5
2009 Performance Rating: 2406
*Tiebreak Games don't count towards official USCL records



2008 Games: (5.0/6)

  1. Week 1: NM Joshua Sinanan (SEA) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  2. Week 2: NM Matt Herman (NY) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  3. Week 3: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs FM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) 0-1
  4. Week 5: FM John Bick (TEN) vs NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 0-1
  5. Week 6: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Jon Burgess (CHC) 1-0
  6. Week 7: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs NM Leo Martinez (ARZ) 1-0

2008 MVP Points: 11
2008 Performance Rating: 2516



2007 Games: (2.5/3)

  1. Week 4: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs James Wu (TEN) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 7: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs Daniel Naroditsky (SF) 1-0
  3. Week 9: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2007 MVP Points: 5
2007 Performance Rating: 2495



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2386
MVP Pts21.5
Lifetime Score29.5/53 (56%)
Performance Rating2397
Date of Birth1989