There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Carolina Cobras /

IM Jonathan Schroer


Jonathan Schroer's Games

2015 Games: (4.0/11)

  1. Week 1: NM Vadim Martirosov (BOS) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs FM Jorge Pelaez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Alonso Zapata (ATL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: GM Alex Lenderman (MAN) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Raja Panjwani (NY) 0-1
  6. Week 6: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 0-1
  7. Week 7: IM David Vigorito (NE) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  8. Week 8: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  9. Week 9: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Sergey Kudrin (CON) 1/2-1/2
  10. Week 10: NM Richard Francisco (ATL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 0-1
  11. Wildcard Round: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2015 MVP Points: (-5)
2015 Performance Rating: 2397



2014 Games: (0.5/2)

  1. Week 1: NM Damir Studen (ATL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 5: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Alexander Katz (NJ) 1/2-1/2

2014 MVP Points: (-3.5)
2014 Performance Rating: 2176



2013 Games: (0.5/9)

  1. Week 1: GM Yuniesky Quesada (MIA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Cristian Chirila (DAL) 0-1
  3. Week 3: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 0-1
  4. Week 5: GM Varuzhan Akobian (STL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  5. Week 6: IM Luke Harmon-Vellotti (LA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  6. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 8: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Week 9: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 0-1
  9. Week 10: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Anatoly Bykhovsky (STL) 0-1

2013 MVP Points: (-32)
2013 Performance Rating: 2265



2012 Games: (2.5/10)

  1. Week 1: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Robert Hess (CON) 0-1
  3. Week 3: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Zhanibek Amanov (LA) 0-1
  4. Week 4: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 0-1
  6. Week 6: GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Ben Finegold (STL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 8: GM Varuzhan Akobian (SEA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  9. Week 9: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Julio Sadorra (DAL) 0-1
  10. Week 10: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: (-17)
2012 Performance Rating: 2403



2011 Games: (3.0/8)

  1. Week 1: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Alex Fishbein (NJ) 1-0
  2. Week 2: GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 0-1
  4. Week 5: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  5. Week 7: GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs SM Jorge Sammour-Hasbun (BOS) 0-1
  7. Week 9: IM David Vigorito (NE) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 10: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2011 MVP Points: (-5)
2011 Performance Rating: 2480



2010 Games: (2.0/10)

  1. Week 1: IM Dmitry Schneider (MAN) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Jonathan Schroer (MIA) vs IM Robert Hungaski (NE) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  4. Week 4: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  5. Week 5: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 0-1
  6. Week 6: IM Salvijus Bercys (DAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  7. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Week 8: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  9. Week 9: IM Robert Hungaski (NE) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  10. Week 10: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2

2010 MVP Points: (-24)
2010 Performance Rating: 2291



2009 Games: (2.5/10)

  1. Week 1: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Leonid Kritz (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  3. Week 3: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 0-1
  4. Week 4: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) 0-1
  7. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Jacek Stopa (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 8: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  9. Week 9: IM Dmitry Schneider (MAN) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  10. Week 10: IM Bryan Smith (PHI) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2009 MVP Points: (-18)
2009 Performance Rating: 2379



2008 Games: (1.5/2)

  1. Week 3: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0

2008 MVP Points: 4
2008 Performance Rating: 2646



2007 Games: (4.0/8)

  1. Week 2: IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Blas Lugo (MIA) 1-0
  3. Week 4: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM John Bartholomew (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 5: FM Slava Mikhailuk (SEA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  5. Week 6: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: FM Todd Andrews (TEN) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  7. Week 8: IM David Pruess (SF) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 9: NM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2007 MVP Points: 3
2007 Performance Rating: 2402



2006 Games: (0.0/1)

  1. Week 4: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2006 MVP Points: (-3)
2006 Performance Rating: 1979



2005 Games: (0.0/2)

  1. Week 3: IM Josh Friedel (BOS) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 7: FM David Pruess (SF) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0

2005 MVP Points: (-5)
2005 Performance Rating: 2069



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2427
MVP Pts(-105.5)
Lifetime Score20.5/73 (28%)
Performance Rating2360
Date of Birth1963