There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Baltimore Kingfishers /

IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat


Tegshsuren Enkhbat's Games

2014 Games: (0.5/2)

  1. Week 2: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Kassa Korley (CAR) 0-1
  2. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Rico Salimbagat (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2014 MVP Points: (-4)
2014 Performance Rating: 2186



2013 Games: (2.5/7)

  1. Week 1: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs GM Michael Rohde (CON) 0-1
  2. Week 2: FM Steven Winer (NE) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  3. Week 3: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Dmitry Schneider (MAN) 1-0
  4. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 6: FM Dov Gorman (PHI) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Steven Winer (NE) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 10: SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: (-6)
2013 Performance Rating: 2339



2012 Games: (1.5/5)

  1. Week 1: GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 6: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 9: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) 0-1
  5. Quarterfinals: GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: (-2.5)
2012 Performance Rating: 2453



2011 Games: (4.0/10)

  1. Week 1: GM John Fedorowicz (NY) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  3. Week 3: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM David Vigorito (NE) 1-0
  4. Week 4: NM Vadim Martirosov (BOS) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs GM Dmitry Gurevich (CHC) 1-0
  7. Week 7: FM Kassa Korley (CAR) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  8. Week 8: FM Andrei Zaremba (MAN) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  9. Week 9: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Jan van de Mortel (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  10. Week 10: IM Robert Hungaski (NE) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0

2011 MVP Points: (-3.5)
2011 Performance Rating: 2401



2010 Games: (2.5/6)

  1. Week 1: IM Robert Hungaski (NE) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) 0-1
  3. Week 3: FM Ron Simpson (CAR) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  4. Week 5: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs NM Matt Herman (NY) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 10: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  6. Quarterfinals: IM Marc Esserman (BOS) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0

2010 MVP Points: 0.5
2010 Performance Rating: 2390



2009 Games: (4.0/8)

  1. Week 1: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Yury Lapshun (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 7: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 8: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 9: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  7. Week 10: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Todd Andrews (TEN) 1/2-1/2
  8. Quarterfinals: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) 1/2-1/2

2009 MVP Points: 0
2009 Performance Rating: 2492



2008 Games: (2.5/7)

  1. Week 3: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 4: IM Alex Lenderman (MAN) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  3. Week 5: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Florin Felecan (CHC) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) 0-1
  5. Week 7: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  6. Week 9: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Irina Krush (NY) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 10: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Todd Andrews (TEN) 1-0

2008 MVP Points: (-6)
2008 Performance Rating: 2349



2007 Games: (4.5/9)

  1. Week 1: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: IM Dean Ippolito (NJ) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  4. Week 4: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Richard Costigan (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 5: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs SM Jorge Sammour-Hasbun (BOS) 0-1
  6. Week 6: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Ron Burnett (TEN) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 8: IM Bryan Smith (PHI) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0
  8. Week 9: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Aviv Friedman (NJ) 1-0
  9. Week 10: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2007 MVP Points: 2
2007 Performance Rating: 2457



2006 Games: (2.0/3)

  1. Week 1: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  2. Week 2: FM Robert Hess (NY) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  3. Week 10: FM William Kelleher (BOS) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article

2006 MVP Points: 6
2006 Performance Rating: 2571



2005 Games: (7.0/12)

  1. Week 1: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Irina Krush (NY) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs NM Carl Boor (PHI) 1-0
  4. Week 4: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Josh Friedel (BOS) 1-0
  5. Week 5: GM Magesh Panchanathan (DAL) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs FM Dmitry Zilberstein (SF) 1-0
  7. Week 7: IM Richard Costigan (PHI) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  8. Week 8: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  9. Week 9: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs NM Gregory Braylovsky (NY) 0-1
  10. Week 10: NM Steven Winer (BOS) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  11. Semifinals: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Jay Bonin (NY) 0-1
  12. Championship: FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2

2005 MVP Points: 12
2005 Performance Rating: 2493



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2483
MVP Pts(-1.5)
Lifetime Score31.0/69 (45%)
Performance Rating2427
Date of Birth1970