There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Manhattan Applesauce /

IM Lev Milman


Lev Milman's Games

2012 Games: (2.0/5)

  1. Week 1: GM Alex Lenderman (NY) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1-0
  2. Week 3: IM Jonathan Yedidia (NE) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 0-1
  3. Week 5: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM Albert Kapengut (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 7: FM Dov Gorman (PHI) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1-0
  5. Week 10: IM Justin Sarkar (CON) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2012 MVP Points: (-1.5)
2012 Performance Rating: 2383



2011 Games: (2.5/6)

  1. Week 1: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 2: SM Jorge Sammour-Hasbun (BOS) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  3. Week 3: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM Alexander Matros (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM Dmitry Zilberstein (SF) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM Robert Hungaski (NE) 0-1
  6. Week 10: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1/2-1/2

2011 MVP Points: (-3)
2011 Performance Rating: 2473



2010 Games: (2.0/5)

  1. Week 2: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) 0-1
  2. Week 5: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 0-1
  3. Week 7: GM Larry Kaufman (BAL) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 0-1
  4. Week 8: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Lev Milman (MAN) 1-0
  5. Week 10: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM Sam Shankland (NE) 0-1

2010 MVP Points: (-2)
2010 Performance Rating: 2424



2009 Games: (1.0/3)

  1. Week 6: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs GM Gregory Serper (SEA) 0-1
  2. Week 8: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs IM John Donaldson (SF) 0-1
  3. Week 10: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0

2009 MVP Points: (-4)
2009 Performance Rating: 2349



2008 Games: (6.0/12) — Played for Carolina Cobras

  1. Week 1: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Ron Burnett (TEN) 1-0
  2. Week 2: GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Sergey Erenburg (BAL) 0-1
  4. Week 4: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Alex Shabalov (NY) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  5. Week 5: IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Dmitry Schneider (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 7: GM Sergey Erenburg (BAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 8: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  9. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  10. Week 10: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Sergey Kudrin (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  11. Quarterfinals: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  12. Semifinals: GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2

2008 MVP Points: (-1)
2008 Performance Rating: 2577



2007 Games: (4.0/9) — Played for Carolina Cobras

  1. Week 1: IM Josh Friedel (SF) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  2. Week 2: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  4. Week 4: IM Drasko Boskovic (DAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  5. Week 5: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Gregory Serper (SEA) 0-1
  6. Week 6: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 7: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Ron Burnett (TEN) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Week 8: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  9. Week 9: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) 1-0

2007 MVP Points: (-1)
2007 Performance Rating: 2472



2006 Games: (3.5/11) — Played for Carolina Cobras

  1. Week 1: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  3. Week 3: FM Bruci Lopez (BAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 0-1
  5. Week 5: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  6. Week 6: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Jaan Ehlvest (PHI) 0-1
  7. Week 7: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  8. Week 8: GM Jaan Ehlvest (PHI) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  9. Week 9: GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  10. Week 10: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Ron Burnett (TEN) 1-0
  11. Wildcard Round: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1

2006 MVP Points: (-18)
2006 Performance Rating: 2407



2005 Games: (5.5/9) — Played for Carolina Cobras

  1. Week 1: IM Mladen Vucic (SF) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  4. Week 4: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Amon Simutowe (DAL) 1-0
  5. Week 5: NM Gregory Braylovsky (NY) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: FM Norman Rogers (PHI) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  7. Week 7: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs FM Dmitry Zilberstein (SF) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 8: FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 0-1
  9. Week 10: IM Dmitry Schneider (DAL) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article

2005 MVP Points: 11
2005 Performance Rating: 2536



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2483
MVP Pts(-19.5)
Lifetime Score26.5/60 (44%)
Performance Rating2473
Date of Birth1987