There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

New Jersey Knockouts /

GM Alex Stripunsky


Alex Stripunsky's Games

2015 Games: (6.0/8)

  1. Week 3: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  2. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Daniel Gurevich (ATL) 1-0
  3. Week 7: GM Mark Paragua (NY) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  4. Week 8: IM Danny Edelman (CON) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  5. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 10: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  7. Wildcard Round: IM Kassa Korley (CAR) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Quarterfinals: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Mark Paragua (NY) 1/2-1/2

2015 MVP Points: 23
2015 Performance Rating: 2732



2014 Games: (4.0/12)

  1. Week 1: GM Robert Hungaski (MAN) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  3. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Carlos Perdomo (ATL) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Kassa Korley (CAR) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0
  6. Week 6: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs FM Dov Gorman (PHI) 1-0
  7. Week 7: GM Andrey Stukopin (RIO) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0
  8. Week 8: GM Gata Kamsky (NY) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  9. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) 0-1
  10. Week 10: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs IM Steven Zierk (BOS) 0-1
  11. Wildcard Round: IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  12. Quarterfinals: GM Wesley So (STL) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0

2014 MVP Points: (-5)
2014 Performance Rating: 2420



2013 Games: (3.5/6)

  1. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) 1-0
  2. Week 5: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Zviad Izoria (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 6: GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  4. Week 8: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs FM Tom Bartell (PHI) 1-0
  5. Week 9: GM Tamaz Gelashvili (NY) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0
  6. Week 10: GM Zviad Izoria (MAN) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: 5
2013 Performance Rating: 2678



2012 Games: (4.0/8)

  1. Week 1: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Alexander Ivanov (NE) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  3. Week 5: GM Vladimir Romanenko (MAN) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article
  4. Week 6: GM Ben Finegold (STL) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs SM Jorge Sammour-Hasbun (BOS) 0-1
  6. Week 8: GM Niclas Huschenbeth (BAL) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) 0-1
  7. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Robert Hess (CON) 0-1
  8. Week 10: GM Alex Stripunsky (NJ) vs GM Tamaz Gelashvili (NY) 0-1

2012 MVP Points: 4
2012 Performance Rating: 2631



2011 Games: (4.0/6) — Played for Manhattan Applesauce

  1. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 5: GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 6: GM Patrick Wolff (SF) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0
  4. Week 9: GM Magesh Panchanathan (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  5. Quarterfinals: GM Magesh Panchanathan (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  6. Semifinals: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 1-0

2011 MVP Points: 2
2011 Performance Rating: 2750



2010 Games: (2.0/6) — Played for Manhattan Applesauce

  1. Week 2: GM Sergey Erenburg (BOS) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0
  2. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: IM Andranik Matikozyan (LA) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  5. Week 7: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Sergey Erenburg (BAL) 0-1
  6. Week 9: IM Jay Bonin (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0

2010 MVP Points: (-7)
2010 Performance Rating: 2441



2009 Games: (3.5/5) — Played for Manhattan Applesauce

  1. Week 1: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 0-1
  2. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 5: GM Sergey Kudrin (PHI) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  4. Week 8: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  5. Week 10: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1

2009 MVP Points: 11
2009 Performance Rating: 2775



2008 Games: (4.0/6) — Played for Manhattan Applesauce

  1. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs IM Rogelio Barcenilla (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 5: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM John Fedorowicz (NY) 1-0
  3. Week 7: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 8: FM Florin Felecan (CHC) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  5. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs IM Lev Milman (CAR) 1-0
  6. Quarterfinals: GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0

2008 MVP Points: 13
2008 Performance Rating: 2694



2007 Games: (2.5/7) — Played for Manhattan Applesauce

  1. Week 1: GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0
  2. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs IM Drasko Boskovic (DAL) 0-1
  3. Week 4: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Joel Benjamin (NJ) 1-0
  4. Week 5: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Sergey Kudrin (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 6: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 1-0
  6. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 10: GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) vs GM Pawel Blehm (BAL) 1/2-1/2

2007 MVP Points: (-8)
2007 Performance Rating: 2501



2005 Games: (5.0/8) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 1: IM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  2. Week 2: IM Pascal Charbonneau (BAL) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) vs IM Vince McCambridge (SF) 1-0
  4. Week 6: GM Alejandro Ramirez (DAL) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) 0-1
  5. Week 7: GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) vs IM Josh Friedel (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) vs FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) 1-0
  7. Week 9: GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) vs IM Pascal Charbonneau (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Semifinals: GM Alex Stripunsky (NY) vs IM Pascal Charbonneau (BAL) 1/2-1/2

2005 MVP Points: 10
2005 Performance Rating: 2616



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2661
MVP Pts48
Lifetime Score38.5/72 (53%)
Performance Rating2606
Date of Birth1970