There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

team logo

New England Nor'easters

team logo

2015 Roster (May Rating List)

1.GM Alexander Ivanov2616
2.IM David Vigorito2517
3.SM Mika Brattain2460
4.IM Alexander Katz2433
5.FM Steven Winer2425
6.FM Charles Riordan2342
7.NM Lawyer Times2330
8.NM Tim Sage2228
9.NM Siddharth Arun2223
10.NM Carissa Yip2215
11.Nithin Kavi2039

• Manager: David Vigorito
• Assistant Manager: Charles Riordan

2015 Schedule

WeekDateColorOpponentResult
18/25BPhiladelphia InventorsWin 3-1
29/1WNew Jersey KnockoutsWin 2.5-1.5
39/8BBoston BlitzWin 2.5-1.5
49/15WNew York KnightsLoss 2.5-1.5
59/22WConnecticut DreadnoughtsTie 2-2
69/30BAtlanta KingsWin 2.5-1.5
710/6WCarolina CobrasTie 2-2
810/13BMiami SharksWin 3-1
910/20BManhattan ApplesauceTie 2-2
1010/27WBoston BlitzWin 3-1
Regular Season Record7.5 - 2.5
Quarterfinals11/10WManhattan ApplesauceLoss 2.5-1.5

Rosters & Schedules by Year

2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010

New England's Historical Results

2015: 7.5 – 2.5, 1st Place in the Eastern Division. Lost 2.5 - 1.5 in Quarterfinals to Manhattan

2014: 0.5 – 9.5, 6th Place in the Eastern Division. Failed to qualify for the Playoffs

2013: 7.0 – 3.0, 1st Place in the Northeast Division. Lost 2.5 - 1.5 in Semifinals to New York

2012: 3.0 – 7.0, 8th Place in the Eastern Division. Failed to qualify for the Playoffs

2011: 5.5 – 4.5, 5th Place in the Eastern Division. Failed to qualify for the Playoffs

2010: 9.5 – 0.5, 1st Place in the Eastern Division. Won Championship 3 - 1 against Miami

Stats

Most All Time MVP Points (end of 2015 season)
1.NM Lawyer Times21.0
2.GM Robert Hungaski15.0
3.GM Sam Shankland14.0
Overall Record vs USCL TeamsMatch PointsGame Points
Arizona ScorpionsNever PlayedNever Played
Atlanta Kings1.0/1 (100%)2.5/4 (63%)
Baltimore Kingfishers3.5/6 (58%)12.5/24 (52%)
Boston Blitz5.0/10 (50%)21.0/40 (53%)
Carolina Cobras5.0/6 (83%)16.0/24 (67%)
Chicago BlazeNever PlayedNever Played
Connecticut Dreadnoughts3.0/6 (50%)11.0/24 (46%)
Dallas Destiny0.5/2 (25%)3.0/8 (38%)
Las Vegas Desert RatsNever PlayedNever Played
Lubbock TornadoesNever PlayedNever Played
Los Angeles Vibe1.0/1 (100%)3.5/4 (88%)
Manhattan Applesauce2.5/6 (42%)12.0/24 (50%)
Miami Sharks3.5/5 (70%)12.0/20 (60%)
Minnesota BlizzardNever PlayedNever Played
New York Knights3.0/9 (33%)16.5/36 (46%)
New Jersey Knockouts4.0/6 (67%)13.5/24 (56%)
Philadelphia Inventors3.0/6 (50%)11.5/24 (48%)
Rio Grande OspreysNever PlayedNever Played
San Diego SurfersNever PlayedNever Played
San Francisco Mechanics0.0/1 (0%)1.5/4 (38%)
Seattle SluggersNever PlayedNever Played
St. Louis Arch Bishops1.0/1 (100%)3.5/4 (88%)
Tennessee TempoNever PlayedNever Played