There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

San Francisco Mechanics /

GM Vinay Bhat


Vinay Bhat's Games

2015 Games: (4.5/6)

  1. Week 2: NM Stevan Djordjevic (SD) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  2. Week 4: IM Dionisio Aldama (LV) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  3. Week 8: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Michael Lee (SEA) 1-0
  4. Week 10: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Anton Kovalyov (RIO) 1/2-1/2
  5. Wildcard Round: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs FM Roland Feng (SEA) 1-0
  6. Quarterfinals: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Jeffery Xiong (DAL) 0-1

2015 MVP Points: 13
2015 Performance Rating: 2716



2014 Games: (2.0/5)

  1. Week 2: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs FM Costin Cozianu (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 7: GM Mark Paragua (CON) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: IM Jeffery Xiong (DAL) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0
  4. Week 9: GM Gata Kamsky (NY) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0
  5. Week 10: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Larry Remlinger (LA) 1-0

2014 MVP Points: (-3)
2014 Performance Rating: 2471



2013 Games: (5.5/8)

  1. Week 1: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Andranik Matikozyan (LA) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 4: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 5: GM Timur Gareyev (SEA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 6: FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  5. Week 7: GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 8: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Shahin Mohandesi (ARZ) 1-0
  7. Quarterfinals: GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  8. Semifinals: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2

2013 MVP Points: 10.5
2013 Performance Rating: 2720



2012 Games: (1.5/4)

  1. Week 1: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 0-1
  2. Week 3: GM Ben Finegold (STL) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Cristian Chirila (DAL) 1-0
  4. Week 9: GM Varuzhan Akobian (SEA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: (-3)
2012 Performance Rating: 2464



2011 Games: (2.5/5)

  1. Week 3: GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  2. Week 4: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0
  3. Week 7: GM Yury Shulman (CHC) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 9: IM Salvijus Bercys (DAL) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  5. Quarterfinals: IM Zhanibek Amanov (LA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0

2011 MVP Points: 7
2011 Performance Rating: 2588



2009 Games: (3.5/6)

  1. Week 7: IM Rogelio Barcenilla (ARZ) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0
  2. Week 8: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Alex Stripunsky (MAN) 0-1
  3. Week 9: FM Todd Andrews (TEN) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  4. Week 10: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Salvijus Bercys (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  5. Quarterfinals: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs FM Daniel Rensch (ARZ) 1-0
  6. Semifinals: IM Blas Lugo (MIA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1

2009 MVP Points: (-4)
2009 Performance Rating: 2543



2008 Games: (4.5/8)

  1. Week 2: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Emory Tate (CHC) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  2. Week 5: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) 0-1
  3. Week 6: IM Rogelio Barcenilla (ARZ) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 7: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Hikaru Nakamura (SEA) 1-0
  5. Week 8: FM Todd Andrews (TEN) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  6. Week 9: GM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Davorin Kuljasevic (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 10: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  8. Quarterfinals: IM Davorin Kuljasevic (DAL) vs GM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article

2008 MVP Points: 9
2008 Performance Rating: 2600



2007 Games: (6.0/8)

  1. Week 1: FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM John Bartholomew (DAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  3. Week 3: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Hikaru Nakamura (NY) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  4. Week 6: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs FM William Kelleher (BOS) 1-0
  5. Week 8: IM Lev Milman (CAR) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  6. Week 9: IM Eric Tangborn (SEA) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  7. Week 10: IM Davorin Kuljasevic (DAL) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1-0
  8. Wildcard Round: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Blas Lugo (MIA) 0-1

2007 MVP Points: 20
2007 Performance Rating: 2690



2006 Games: (4.0/5)

  1. Week 1: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Magesh Panchanathan (DAL) 1-0
  2. Week 6: IM Irina Krush (NY) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 7: FM Slava Mikhailuk (SEA) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 0-1
  4. Week 9: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  5. Semifinals: IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2

2006 MVP Points: 12
2006 Performance Rating: 2753



2005 Games: (2.0/3)

  1. Week 7: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Marcin Kaminski (CAR) 1-0
  2. Week 9: GM Alejandro Ramirez (DAL) vs IM Vinay Bhat (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Semifinals: IM Vinay Bhat (SF) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1/2-1/2

2005 MVP Points: 5
2005 Performance Rating: 2684



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2570
MVP Pts66.5
Lifetime Score36.0/58 (62%)
Performance Rating2631
Date of Birth1984