There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

New Jersey Knockouts /

GM Mackenzie Molner


Mackenzie Molner's Games

2015 Games: (3.0/4)

  1. Week 3: GM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Rodion Rubenchik (PHI) 1-0
  2. Week 5: GM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs IM Steven Zierk (BOS) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: GM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Leif Pressman (CON) 1-0
  4. Week 10: NM Peter Minear (PHI) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2

2015 MVP Points: 8
2015 Performance Rating: 2611



2014 Games: (5.5/9) — Played for Arizona Scorpions

  1. Week 2: GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Julio Sadorra (DAL) 0-1
  2. Week 3: GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  3. Week 4: GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 0-1
  4. Week 5: GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Wesley So (STL) 0-1
  5. Week 6: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: IM Tanguy Ringoir (BAL) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 8: GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs IM Andranik Matikozyan (LA) 1-0
  8. Week 9: GM Robert Hungaski (MAN) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  9. Week 10: GM Anton Kovalyov (RIO) vs GM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 0-1

2014 MVP Points: 13
2014 Performance Rating: 2716



2013 Games: (4.0/9) — Played for Arizona Scorpions

  1. Week 1: FM Costin Cozianu (SEA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 2: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0
  4. Week 4: GM Robert Hungaski (MAN) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Varuzhan Akobian (STL) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 7: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Michael Rohde (CON) 0-1
  8. Week 9: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Timur Gareyev (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  9. Week 10: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs WGM Tatev Abrahamyan (LA) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: (-1)
2013 Performance Rating: 2543



2012 Games: (6.5/12) — Played for Arizona Scorpions

  1. Week 1: IM Andranik Matikozyan (LA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Varuzhan Akobian (SEA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0
  4. Week 4: GM Vladimir Romanenko (MAN) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 5: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 6: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Giorgi Margvelashvili (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 7: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 8: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1-0
  9. Week 9: GM Andre Diamant (STL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  10. Week 10: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0
  11. Quarterfinals: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Andre Diamant (STL) 1/2-1/2
  12. Semifinals: GM Varuzhan Akobian (SEA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: 11
2012 Performance Rating: 2608



2011 Games: (5.0/9) — Played for Arizona Scorpions

  1. Week 1: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: GM Josh Friedel (CHC) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: GM Ben Finegold (STL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0
  4. Week 5: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1-0
  5. Week 6: GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 0-1
  6. Week 7: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs IM Salvijus Bercys (DAL) 1-0
  7. Week 8: IM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 0-1
  8. Week 9: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs WGM Tatev Abrahamyan (LA) 0-1
  9. Week 10: GM Yury Shulman (CHC) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article

2011 MVP Points: 8
2011 Performance Rating: 2633



2010 Games: (1.5/5)

  1. Week 5: GM Eugene Perelshteyn (BOS) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  2. Week 6: IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Slava Mikhailuk (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 8: IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  4. Week 9: IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs IM Irina Krush (NY) 1-0
  5. Week 10: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (BAL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0

2010 MVP Points: (-6)
2010 Performance Rating: 2338



2009 Games: (3.0/6)

  1. Week 4: SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs NM Matt Herman (NY) 1-0
  2. Week 5: IM Angelo Young (CHC) vs SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 6: FM Daniel Rensch (ARZ) vs SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 10: IM Lev Milman (MAN) vs SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  5. Quarterfinals: SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Shinsaku Uesugi (BAL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Semifinals: SM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs NM Matt Herman (NY) 1/2-1/2

2009 MVP Points: 1.5
2009 Performance Rating: 2362



2008 Games: (5.0/8)

  1. Week 1: FM Ray Kaufman (BAL) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 0-1
  2. Week 2: IM Eli Vovsha (MAN) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  3. Week 3: FM John Readey (SEA) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 4: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs NM Charles Riordan (BOS) 1-0
  5. Week 6: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Ray Kaufman (BAL) 1-0
  6. Week 8: FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0
  7. Week 9: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Osmany Perea (MIA) 1-0
  8. Week 10: SM Gregory Braylovsky (NY) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2

2008 MVP Points: 7
2008 Performance Rating: 2491



2007 Games: (3.0/5)

  1. Week 1: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Teddy Coleman (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 4: FM James Critelli (MAN) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 5: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs FM Marc Arnold (NY) 1-0
  4. Week 9: NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) vs IM Larry Kaufman (BAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  5. Week 10: IM Jay Bonin (NY) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NJ) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article

2007 MVP Points: 3.5
2007 Performance Rating: 2432



2006 Games: (0.5/4) — Played for New York Knights

  1. Week 3: NM Vadim Martirosov (BOS) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NY) 1-0
  2. Week 4: FM Oleg Zaikov (CAR) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NY) 1-0
  3. Week 6: IM David Pruess (SF) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NY) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 9: FM Ralph Zimmer (BAL) vs NM Mackenzie Molner (NY) 1-0

2006 MVP Points: (-5)
2006 Performance Rating: 2026



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2592
MVP Pts40
Lifetime Score37.0/71 (52%)
Performance Rating2519
Date of Birth1988