There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be three minutes with a three second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

Dallas Destiny /

GM Conrad Holt


Conrad Holt's Games

2015 Games: (3.5/5)

  1. Week 2: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Andrey Stukopin (RIO) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 9: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Mauricio Flores (MIN) 1-0
  3. Week 10: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Illya Nyzhnyk (STL) 1-0
  4. Quarterfinals: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) 1/2-1/2
  5. Semifinals: GM Illya Nyzhnyk (STL) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2

2015 MVP Points: 7.5
2015 Performance Rating: 2842



2014 Games: (5.5/10)

  1. Week 1: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM Andranik Matikozyan (LA) 1-0
  2. Week 3: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Mark Paragua (CON) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 6: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Andrey Stukopin (RIO) 1/2-1/2
  4. Week 7: GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1
  5. Week 8: GM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2 (Game of the Year!)     article
  6. Week 9: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs NM Federico Gonzalez (MIA) 1-0
  7. Week 10: IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Quarterfinals: GM Daniel Naroditsky (SF) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  9. Semifinals: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Gata Kamsky (NY) 1/2-1/2
  10. Championship: GM Wesley So (STL) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  11. Championship Tiebreaker Game #5: GM Varuzhan Akobian (STL) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0

2014 MVP Points: 14
2014 Performance Rating: 2644
*Tiebreak Games don't count towards official USCL records



2013 Games: (4.5/9)

  1. Week 1: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Varuzhan Akobian (STL) 1-0
  2. Week 3: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) 1-0
  3. Week 4: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Niclas Huschenbeth (BAL) 1-0
  4. Week 5: GM Julio Becerra (MIA) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 7: FM Tom Bartell (PHI) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0
  6. Week 8: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  7. Week 9: GM Varuzhan Akobian (STL) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0
  8. Week 10: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 0-1
  9. Quarterfinals: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 0-1 (Game of the Week!)     article

2013 MVP Points: 5
2013 Performance Rating: 2602



2012 Games: (4.5/8)

  1. Week 2: GM Sam Shankland (NE) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0
  2. Week 4: SM Denys Shmelov (BOS) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2 (Game of the Week!)     article
  3. Week 5: IM Zhanibek Amanov (LA) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1
  4. Week 6: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Pascal Charbonneau (NY) 1-0
  5. Week 7: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 9: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs FM Kassa Korley (CAR) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 10: GM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Andre Diamant (STL) 1-0
  8. Quarterfinals: IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) vs GM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1-0

2012 MVP Points: 10
2012 Performance Rating: 2565



2011 Games: (9.0/10)

  1. Week 1: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs FM Joel Banawa (LA) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  2. Week 2: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: FM Joaquin Banawa (STL) vs IM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1
  4. Week 4: NM Joshua Sinanan (SEA) vs IM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1
  5. Week 6: FM Mike Klein (CAR) vs IM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1
  6. Week 7: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs FM Joel Banawa (ARZ) 1-0
  7. Week 8: GM Dmitry Gurevich (CHC) vs IM Conrad Holt (DAL) 1/2-1/2
  8. Week 9: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs IM David Pruess (SF) 1-0
  9. Week 10: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs FM Jorge Pelaez (MIA) 1-0
  10. Quarterfinals: GM Mesgen Amanov (CHC) vs IM Conrad Holt (DAL) 0-1

2011 MVP Points: 23
2011 Performance Rating: 2744



portrait

Stats as of August 2015

Rating2615
MVP Pts59.5
Lifetime Score27.0/42 (64%)
Performance Rating2667
Date of Birth1993