There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from September of the previous year through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2590, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

There are a couple of reasons why a team in a match might have an average rating above 2400.75. They are:

1. Each team is allowed to use any rating list from January through August of the current year. The ratings shown on this page will all be from August though - sometimes resulting in a seemingly higher rating average than would legally be allowed.

2. When a team uses a player rated above 2600, that player only counts as 2600 when determining a lineup's legality. However what is shown on this page will be the actual average which of course might be higher.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

3. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

4. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 4.0 - 2.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 3.5 - 2.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

5. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

6. Total Game Points from Board 1

7. Total Game Points from Board 2

8. Total Game Points from Board 3

9. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

10. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If there is a tie during the regular season as to the finishing order for playoff positioning, the following rules will be used (for instance if two teams are tied for second place with seven match points each). Tiebreak #1 is of course the first tiebreak with the lower ones being used only if all the above tiebreak procedures also result in a tie.

1. Total Team Game Points. Thus winning a match 4 - 0 will give you more tiebreak points than winning a match 3 - 1.

2. Strength of Schedule; the team whose opponents have the highest combined record wins the tiebreak.

3. Average rating of opponents throughout the season, using the August rating list of that season.

4. Head to Head Results. If you have beaten the opposing team 1.5 - 0.5 during the regular season, you will get the higher seeding.

5. Total Match Points versus Divisional Teams. Thus if Team A went 5.0 - 3.0 in Divisional Matches while Team B went 4.5 - 3.5 then Team A would have the better tiebreaks.

6. Total Game Points versus Divisional Teams

7. Total Game Points from Board 1

8. Total Game Points from Board 2

9. Total Game Points from Board 3

10. Total number of team wins. Thus if one team has a total of twenty five points, with twenty of these points being from wins, whereas another team has a total of twenty five points with only nineteen being from wins, the team with twenty wins has the better tiebreaks.

11. An Armageddon blitz game between chosen members of the teams

If there is a tie between three teams in both match points and game points, we will use the above rules to decide the order amongst the teams. The last resort will be an online blitz game between chosen members of the teams.

If the regulation match is tied 2 - 2, the following tiebreak procedures will be take place after a ten minute break:

1. The fourth boards from each team will play each other. The team that won on the highest board during the original match will choose their color for the first game. If all regulation games were drawn, the lower rated team gets to choose colors for the first tiebreak game. The time control will be five minutes with a five second increment. The loser of this game will be eliminated, and the winner then faces Board Three of the opposing team.

2. This process continues with the next higher board on each team continually replacing any player of their team who gets eliminated.

3. If a game ends in a draw, both players are eliminated, except if at least one team is using its Board One in which case there is no elimination on a draw, instead colors reverse, and the game is replayed until there is a decisive result.

4. Colors will switch every game for the teams in all circumstances.

5. This process repeats itself until all four players from one team have been eliminated. Thus in order for your opponents to win the match, every one of your team members must be eliminated.

San Francisco Mechanics /

GM Jesse Kraai


Jesse Kraai's Games

2013 Games: (2.5/5)

  1. Week 2: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  2. Week 3: IM Jonathan Schroer (CAR) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 0-1
  3. Week 6: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 0-1
  4. Week 9: GM Melikset Khachiyan (LA) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0
  5. Week 10: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs FM Costin Cozianu (SEA) 1-0

2013 MVP Points: 2
2013 Performance Rating: 2545



2012 Games: (3.0/7)

  1. Week 1: FM Kassa Korley (CAR) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 0-1
  2. Week 2: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Vladimir Romanenko (MAN) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 4: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Giorgi Kacheishvili (NY) 0-1
  4. Week 5: IM Mackenzie Molner (ARZ) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 6: GM Sergey Erenburg (PHI) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0
  6. Week 8: IM Puchen Wang (DAL) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 0-1
  7. Week 9: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs IM Georgi Orlov (SEA) 0-1

2012 MVP Points: (-1.5)
2012 Performance Rating: 2487



2011 Games: (6.5/9)

  1. Week 1: GM Ben Finegold (STL) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0
  2. Week 2: IM Conrad Holt (DAL) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1/2-1/2
  3. Week 3: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs IM Zhanibek Amanov (LA) 1-0
  4. Week 4: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs FM Eric Rodriguez (MIA) 1-0
  5. Week 5: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Varuzhan Akobian (SEA) 1/2-1/2
  6. Week 7: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Mesgen Amanov (CHC) 1/2-1/2
  7. Week 9: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Julio Sadorra (DAL) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  8. Week 10: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs IM Goran Vojinovic (STL) 1-0
  9. Quarterfinals: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs WGM Tatev Abrahamyan (LA) 1-0

2011 MVP Points: 10
2011 Performance Rating: 2708



2010 Games: (1.5/3)

  1. Week 6: GM Larry Christiansen (BOS) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0 (Game of the Week!)     article
  2. Week 7: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs IM Rogelio Barcenilla (ARZ) 1-0
  3. Week 10: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1/2-1/2

2010 MVP Points: 0
2010 Performance Rating: 2625



2009 Games: (3.0/6)

  1. Week 2: IM Daniel Ludwig (DAL) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0
  2. Week 3: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs FM Bruci Lopez (MIA) 1-0
  3. Week 4: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs FM Florin Felecan (CHC) 1-0
  4. Week 5: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs IM Irina Krush (NY) 1/2-1/2
  5. Week 6: FM Marcel Martinez (MIA) vs GM Jesse Kraai (SF) 1-0
  6. Semifinals: GM Jesse Kraai (SF) vs GM Julio Becerra (MIA) 1/2-1/2

2009 MVP Points: 0
2009 Performance Rating: 2504



portrait

Stats as of August 2013

Rating2567
MVP Pts10.5
Lifetime Score16.5/30 (55%)
Performance Rating2580
Date of Birth1972